In Yiddish Author’s Papers, Potential Gold
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/books/18grade.html
I thought this was so interesting. This Yiddish author and lecturer, of whom I have never heard, died over 30 years ago. His name was Chaim Grade (gruh-DAY), and his wife refused to let anyone publish any of his work. In fact, she would not let anyone even examine his notes and papers! Grade was a learned person who survived the Holocaust and then wrote and lectured about it.
Now that Mrs. Grade has died, it’s open season. Since she died without a will and with no survivors, the Bronx public administrator is in charge of overseeing the estate. He has asked four organizations to determine the value of the writings as well as the manner in which they should be disposed. Here is a piece of the article naming the four:
The four are the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research in Manhattan; the New York Public Library; the National Yiddish Book Center in Amherst, Mass.; and Harvard University, through its Yiddish scholar, Ruth R. Wisse. Mrs. Grade blocked access to Grade’s papers by some of these very institutions, so there is a certain paradox in the idea that they might gain control of his work — and possibly unearth a never-published manuscript.
My writing students over the years have learned I have this first manuscript that sits in a drawer and will never be published. I keep it to remind me of how much I’ve learned about writing and publishing, and of how far I’ve come, quite frankly. I would hope that my work, though not scholarly by any means, will be read and enjoyed by others with the exception of this one crummy manuscript. All of my poetry, my journals, whatever I am working on at the time – all of it – should be read, examined and published if there is a market and someone may enjoy it. I’m not saying my work is anywhere in the range of Mr. Grade’s, but my point is that it was written to be read by people.
I just have to wonder what Mrs. Grade’s motivation was. Her husband had previously published, so she knew he wanted his work to be read. That’s where my ideas for possible motives ends. I cannot think of one reason why she would not open his work to scholars who might bring him a larger audience and, therefore, educate the world. If anyone has any thoughts on this, I would love to hear them.